CLICKREPAIR DE SOFTWARE
CLICKREPAIR DE WINDOWS

I've experimented with the sound quality between the various options I have available, including Audacity ClickRepair and Wave Corrector.

CLICKREPAIR DE WINDOWS

Took a bit of learning and Windows only i believe, but it's worked well for me over the years. VS suits me, but I'm always interested in what others are using any why. I don't want to devote a couple of hours to each LP over and above recording time (I have >1500) and plenty of other demands on my time.ДЄs with any tool it's as much about it feeling comfortable in the hand as it is about absolute performance. I want a recording I can listen to on a pair of headphones without being driven to distraction by clicks and general noise, so I'm after minimal damage to the recording. The UI has good depth/functionality but without presenting a horrible learning curve. Recording into flac is useful as the originals occupy a lot less space than they'd do if they were WAV. So All I ever have is the original recording, a few KB of metadata and the output tracks. Then, when tracks are generated, the de-clicking is done. A de-clicking run generates meta-data describing the changes that need to be made. VS doesn't modify the original recording or write out a new version.

CLICKREPAIR DE SOFTWARE

I develop/developed software (user interfaces in Java) and am probably overly sensitive to these things. There was nothing fatal, but there were issues with the appearance and operation of some lists and menus. It's been a while since my last foray with it, and I didn't keep notes. I think I restored 100 records, mainly with ClickRepair (entirely manually, automatic set at 0), alongside iZotope RX for complicated pressings.Д¬lick Repair. Sometimes it doesn't work right but it's rare.Д¬lickRepair is less suited to correct low frequency artefacts such as the ones generated by dimples on the record surface. On a side note, what I like about ClickRepair is that when you're not satisfied with some damage it has repaired 'incorrectly', you can cancel it and redraw the affected waveform by hand, it will use its algorithms while you do this. Unless I misread your sentence, you would have to keep two files in any case, even if you use another restoration software like iZotope RX.

True, I keep the original, and the last ClickRepair run, I delete all the previous runs.

I guess it depends on the person, many people doing record restoration directly record in WAV (or AIFF).

Ok yes I encountered some when I made the tansition from JDK8 to 11, it lost the UI settings etc.

Could you describe the issues with later revisions of the JDK? I use ClickRepair with JDK11 and even later on a laptop (I think it's 14) and didn't encounter any problems.

That said, the ability to listen to the clicks being removed, and dynamically switch between listening to input and output is really useful.

It writes a new output file every de-click run, so AFAIK if you want to keep the original rip, you've got to keep two files.

It won't accept flac input, and most of my recordings are already in flac.

It can be run with a modern JDK, but there are issues with the UI.

It really needs to be run with JDK8 which is very old.

I've had a couple of tries at click repair, and found it to be no better than VS and nowhere near as convenient to use. I use 'VinylStudio' to rip and clean up the clicks and pops.

Clickrepair de